[ Box updated on July 28th, 2007 ] [ original ]
Grand Theft Auto IV Box Cover Comments
Comment on Anthony615's Grand Theft Auto IV Box Art / Cover.
[ Box updated on July 28th, 2007 ] [ original ]
Comment on Anthony615's Grand Theft Auto IV Box Art / Cover.
Done on paint...comments, suggestions, and rate plz.
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
i dont know, the buildings look either drawn or blurry and a helicopter and a moon are in color, oh and whats up with the stars, 2/5
[ Reply ]
DUDE come on it deserves more than 2.....and it aint blurry so you must have somethin wrong with your vision...try it in full view if its still bad
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
the city is blurry or its a drawing of a city and yes its worse in full view
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
i dont know what your saying but its the effect...not blurry. it has the night time like effect. and its waaaaaaaay better than yr gta..hahah
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
i dont know about that but we will have to wait and see, and besides mines a diffrent game
[ Reply ]
don't tell people what you think it deserves, i think the same as #2. it have not background the logo is at the bottom and the image is blurry i viewed it full. paint is a hard program to use but maybe my forum will help you.
[ Reply ]
#7all my boxes are done on paint too. your video thing and that pokemon cut out thing realy helped me a lot.
[ Reply ]
#7, i didnt tell people what it deserves i juss tink he has something against me and gave a crap rating. Also, learn some english before you post something about my boxart. dont be ignorant, you don't know whats going on.
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
#9 I have nothing against you and your boxarts, i told you my suggestions about the box and you updated it, ill give it a 3.5/5 now, because i still dont like the buildings.
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
I think Lenny's is better, but ive never played either games. (please don't get mad at me) Yours is good too.
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
for being done on paint it's really good
[ Reply ]